Today was the Access for All Ride which drew attention to the fact that protected bike lanes are also of vital importance to people who use mobility devices to get around our city.

This ride was organized by Oda Al-anizi, with support from Cycle Toronto and the Bike Brigade. He also serves as our poster boy for today.

Michael introduces the theme of today’s ride: that bike lanes aren’t just for bikes; they’re mobility lanes. Safe, connected infrastructure means access and independence for people of all abilities.

Newly (re)-elected Councillor Mike Layton reminds us of the many years of advocacy it took to get bike lanes on Bloor, and that we are not going to stand by and watch them be taken out.

Ben gives us a safety briefing. In particular, the trio of people with electric wheelchairs will be at the front and will determine the pace for the ride.

Staging now.

Michael is having a conversation with Toronto’s finest about how we can handle running the ride without their assistance. However they insisted on tagging along and didn’t interfere with the ride.

Off we go.


Headed east on Bloor, and taking the lane.






Down St. George.


Harbord.

Queen’s Park Crescent.


Rounding the bend at the south end of QP.

It is bitterly ironic that upgraded protection on the bike lanes on Queen’s Park Crescent is only now in the process of being installed by the city when the province is planning to take them out as soon as next year.

Assembled in front of the legislature.

Kids are first in line for snacks.

Gives us an update on the fight against Bill 212. The case has been brought to the Supreme Court of Canada, but it is not likely that they will take it. He also pointed out that Minister Sakaria declaring victory with the tearing out of just 1 km of bike lanes made him look ridiculous, even to the right wing. (reminding me of GW Bush and his “Mission Accomplished” banner).
He also introduces the next speakers.

Oda talks about how vitally important infrastructure is for users of mobility devices. He said that the discussion around cars vs other road users was unnecessarily divisive when at the end of the day, everyone just wants to get from point A to B safely and reliably. He also acknowledged Aly Van Wyck-Smart, the paraathlete who was arrested while protesting the removal of the bike lanes in Etobicoke. She was dragged out of her wheelchair and video of her arrest is horrifying.

Cyndi is Executive Director of the Bike Brigade. She reminds us that the anti-bike lane movement often focuses on the lycra clad speedsters, and yet the bike lanes are more important for cyclists just trying to get around. In addition, bike lanes keep vulnerable road users out of traffic as well as off of sidewalks. She also mentions how groups such as the Bike Brigade provide a valuable community service. Tearing out the bike lanes affects delivery people of all types, which in turn affects not just them but also the people who depend on them for food, etc.

Chris Glover (MPP Spadina-Fort York) reminds us opposing the government is broader than just defending bike lanes; many things that the Ford Government does are a direct attack on democracy.

Michael gives us a final reminder that there is currently no scheduled work on further removal of bike lanes. People should remain vigilant, but any construction work in areas with bike lanes is not due to their subsequent removal at this time.

Finally, Rob points out that there is a bill that restricts protests that “block key infrastructure” has its last day for public comment today.
You can submit your feedback here.

Some of the questions listed are directly relevant to what happened at the bike lane protests over the past few weeks, and the ability to protest further removals.
- Should the province consider a legislated prohibition related to unauthorized, willful obstruction of a roadway, including overpasses/bridges, where the obstruction is intentional, cannot be easily avoided and blocks travel? Why or why not?
- Should the province consider any of the following? Why or why not?
- A. Developing new police authorities to direct individuals to cease obstructing a roadway, including overpasses/bridges?
- B. Instituting a new provincial offence for individuals that do not comply with this direction?
- C. Creating a new requirement for individuals to provide identifying information for the purposes of issuing a provincial offence notice in relation to the new offence?
- D. Making new arrest powers for police where there is a failure to comply with the duty to identify? This power would exist only where an individual refuses to identify themselves and identity cannot be otherwise ascertained, solely for the purpose of laying the roadway obstruction offence.
- E. Are there other specific legislative or non-legislative changes that the provincial government should consider to address this issue?
There is similar language around the issue of protests around religious institutions, etc.
Got a snack at Pedaal on the way home and was amused by this sign (the green one).

and finally another reminder about what the fight for protected bike lanes is all about.

Update: Rob’s coverage is here, and he does a much better job of remembering what was said in the speeches.











































































































































































